First For Music News

Keane

Perfect Symmetry

Reviewing Keane is always a tricky business. Any sort of faint praise and we get our hands cut off for being traitors to the punk rock cause, but if we give them a proper bashing we’re boorish and predictable. There’s no denying that they’ve had more hits than most, but that’s like judging how many Nobel Prizes you’ve won in comparison to Barry Chuckle: it’s meaningless.

So what have they pulled out of the bag this time? Shite all. This is the same as every other Keane album, so don’t be fooled into thinking they’re reformed characters because of that confusingly funky ’80s-style single. It’s the first track and it’s all downhill after that (insert ‘Spiralling’ pun here). OK, so it worked for Mystery Jets, and now people don’t think they live in a commune and eat out of bins anymore, but somehow Keane just make it all sound sinister. There’s a song called ‘Black Burning Heart’, for God’s sake. And another one called ‘Love Is The End’. Musically, they’ve ripped off swathes of things contemporary and popular to make them ‘hip’, but it just feels like some dodgy old guy at a bus stop telling you he digs Klaxons. “I absolutely do not care what is considered to be fashionable or cool or tasteful – it’s much more about following our own instincts,” bleats Tim Rice-Waterhouse-Oxley or whatever the fuck he’s called. That’s fine, granddad. We’re not listening.

Rebecca Robinson

2 out of 10
 
 
 

Comments (76)

Add a comment

Grimbo 

Oct 10, 2008

u dont like keane do you, rebecca?

Fletch_LT 

Oct 13, 2008

So NME is saying Katy perry's album is better than this?Christ almighty...

millzymitosis 

Oct 13, 2008

Uh....Rebecca...did you learn to write like that in school! You're really really good. How about writing a review that actually says something interesting!

gozzer13 

Oct 13, 2008

I'm not a Keane fan, but this is not a professional review, it is an angry, "indie friendly" manifesto to please "indie" kids.

tinchoargentino 

Oct 13, 2008

loved the review

Soundedd 

Oct 13, 2008

"Another popular band selling millions of albums, so i'll just be another snobby music journalist who tries to be different by hating them", do one Rebecca!

crystalman 

Oct 13, 2008

Interesting, that most of the other music magazines are full of glowing praise for Keane. Maybe our reviewer is scared because these guys can play instruments properly, unlike some bands. If the album had got 7/10 i wouldn't have been surprised. Keane are good, but Radiohead are so much better.

the_punmaster 

Oct 13, 2008

Not too keane on the new album then (swish)

its_rudimentary 

Oct 13, 2008

One for Soundedd's collection....of w*nk

rick 13 

Oct 13, 2008

i hate this band!!!

goboy 

Oct 13, 2008

ok i like Keane, but i am not a fan boy. so i am non biases. So... regardless - putting the band aside for one moment and taking a breath of fresh air... i'll cut to the chase - this is probably one of the worst written reviews i have ever read for any form of media. whoever this Rebecca is - she should be fired. is it fair to give a 2? or even throw in loads of expletives? i don't think Tim will appreciate the last bit - dissing the band because of a his name. I'll tell you what is sinister - the review - not the album. the album is actually really good. maybe Rebecca should listen to the music before slagging it off in such an inappropriate manner. the review has left me with such a sour taste in my mouth.

neverhappyonmondays 

Oct 13, 2008

this review is ridiculous, am sure it will keep the arctics fans happy but seriously 2-10 cos its unfashionable to like keane - let me guess Rebecca your fave album of all time is heathen chemistry

alise 

Oct 14, 2008

rebecca, are you a journalyst? the review seems to be written rather by a fan-teenager than a journalost from a respectable magazine. "Tim Rice-Waterhouse-Oxley or whatever the fuck he’s called" ? Doesn't sound very professional to me... unless you're from Oasis (whom i also like, so nothing personal)

RealMode 

Oct 14, 2008

Spiralling is the best song. 4 more songs are good, the rest is lame. 6/10

Jeff_Metal 

Oct 14, 2008

Is there some sort of secret competition between NME hacks to come up with the worst review possible ? I hope Keane never do a collaboration with Seasick Steve otherwise they'll be truly shafted.

fishski 

Oct 14, 2008

Good grief, is this the standard of review from a staff writer on the NME these days? Not sure which you need more - a new critic or a new editor. Certainly the latter should have told Rebecca to remove a few expletives, along with the appalling inverted snobbery, go back to the drawing board and actually write about the album. It could well be 2/10 for all I know, I haven't heard the album, but it doesn't excuse this shockingly pathetic attempt at a critique. Find a new career Rebecca.

AlexTHFC 

Oct 14, 2008

The thing that is ridiculous is all this slagging off of Rebecca! This review was absolutely spot on! I hadn't bought NME regularly for a few years but this review has renewed my faith and is an absolute work of art! Certainly more artistic than any contrived 'new' sounds poshboys Keane will come up with in their country clubs to try and get back the sales of their first album!

rosslewis 

Oct 14, 2008

Well done my speccy little misanthrope. I hope London is treating you well.

James9000 

Oct 14, 2008

This review is a sad reflection of what the NME has become, a publication that debunks anything popular, basing their reviews on how close a band is to the cocaine-snorting foul mouthed stereotype of the modern rockstar, rather than anything to do with tune or lyric. Should the fact that Keane went to public school matter? Does the fact that Tim Rice-Oxley has a double-barreled name make him a twat? Is it such an unspeakable sin to like music thats popular? The answer to all of these is a categorical No.To be honest, I dont think I could write a more succinct summary of what annoys me about NME these days than the first paragraph of this review, it makes me feel sick.Im not a massive Keane fan, but Id quite like to listen to the album, and from what ive heard its quite good. This review however says absolutely nothing about its musical content. It says that there are influences drawn from the 80s, but because Keane are posh that simply cant be cool. Im all for negative reviews, but seriously, they surely have to be based on the music rather than some grudge held by the reviewer on

theStarry 

Oct 14, 2008

This review is disgusting and absolutely unacceptable. A review of an album that says nothing about the music instead assualts the band with non stop expletives targeting their names and upbringing is just not right. This woman should genuinely be fired, her job is to describe music to her readership, after all she is not the 'rock star' so why is she acting like a spoiled, unintelligable brat? (ps: censors @ nme - im fed up with my riposte's not being aired, sort that out)

Jimmy2605 

Oct 14, 2008

but that’s like judging how many Nobel Prizes you’ve won in comparison to Barry Chuckle: it’s meaningless. - I believe Rebecca you have won the same amount as barry chuckle - stupid comment in a stupid, pointless review - strangely like the album itself - irritatingly had to go elsewhere to find that out !!

hellofagirl 

Oct 14, 2008

This review made me laugh. Seriously. It is super unprofessional and unbelieveably wrong. I'm not a Keane-fan by any means but I got this album and it's so much better than you say, Rebecca. Want my suggestion? Go and actually LISTEN to it :) That would be good for a start. Oh and when you rewrite this review afterwards - take out your brain first. It might turn out to be better style-wise. Fire this woman. Should be fun. :D

alexunder007 

Oct 14, 2008

man. i read nme in brazil, and i'm a fan of the magazine... but, what a ridiculous review. i've never read a review so idiot.I like (and only like) Keane, but this review is no longer what the cd really is. This review is POOR.After this review, i think Rebecca can go write reviews of Britney Spears or Hannah Montanna. :P.

earthgirl 

Oct 14, 2008

childish. can't take nme seriously after this review

nickster36 

Oct 14, 2008

This is poorly written, inflammatory nonsense. How about telling us what the album is actually like, rather than spweing forth vitriol about a band you clearly depise?

adnams 

Oct 14, 2008

Rebecca - HAHAHAHA! You're getting a right beat down on here. Care to reply or have you been moved to "other duties" already?! What's the reckoning there will be a revised review up soon?

jumbo999 

Oct 14, 2008

see my seasick steve review comments for what i think about the standard of this review. that rice waterhouse bit is shocking. really really shocking. how old are you?

WelcomeToVegas 

Oct 14, 2008

Is it any wonder (see what I did there?) that you're getting more negative comments than positive? Fair enough, you may not like the album, or even the band, but that was in no way a professional review. All you have to do is look at the Perfect Symmetry page on Wikipedia and then check out the other reviews. They dwarf the NME one in size, and actually critique it in a decent way.Yes, we get the fact that you don't like Keane, but that should have just been a comment in a Keane review someone else should be writing.

2old2bereadingthisshite 

Oct 14, 2008

"Any sort of faint praise and we get our hands cut off for being traitors to the punk rock cause" - why do nme readers/writers think that all new music should follow some kind of punk ethic? it's pop music for fuck's sake.

chriskilv 

Oct 15, 2008

NME seems to give albums one of two reviews nowadays: 8/10 and some faint praise; or 2/10 and an absolute bashing of the band, their fans and their grans, to boot. Of course, reviews are completely pointless when the music doesn't come into question at all. This review's quite funny, but isn't altogether informative. And, as for last week's on Seasick Steve, well...

Rael99 

Oct 15, 2008

My God is that what passes for critiqueat The N.M.E.these days.It had about as much depth and body as a quaver in a saucer of milk. Was there a review in there somewhere ?? I haven't heard the new Keane CD and your feeble offering hasn't shed any further light on the matter.I guess the review was meant to be hip and trendy instead of juvenille and inarticulate, but the trouble is Rebecca you under estimated the intelligence (and age) of your readers . I guess I did the same with you when I chose to start reading your review.

cantona89 

Oct 15, 2008

yeah this review is a bit overboard. You need to take a deep breath and comeback tomorrow with a fair, non hate filled review.

SurrealMadrid 

Oct 15, 2008

I don't even like Keane but this is the worst review I have ever read! It isn't even a review. It's like a 14 year old's train of thought .Rebecca , you may be a decent journalist for all I know but you talent for writing reviews is abysmal.I'd give you 2/10 for this review

downwitheheist 

Oct 15, 2008

I'm laughing my ass off. I do hope you read the comments on your articles, Ms. Robinson. I'd say NME has successfully fucked itself in the ass by even trying to pass this sort of thing off as a review at all.You are so cool for hating certain bands. Way to not say anything constructive or intelligent, regardless of the album you're talking about. I just assume you're bitter, wallowing in self pity because you work for NME and never actually write anything real. :(

Flash5thRider 

Oct 15, 2008

Keane are for sure one of the blandest acts out there today, but that's just my opinion; lots of people love them. This review is not objective at all and the editor of this site should be strung up for allowing such an undersexed creature publish this wizards wee wee.

phil_7000 

Oct 15, 2008

I agree with the review...Keane are shit but thats my opinion, like the reviewers. I think they belong in the fuckin bin with the Kooks and Kaiser Cheifs and if none of them ever showed there faces again it wouldnt be a great loss (people may miss giving there opinions on them though!!). Someone needed to highlight how shit bands like this a just review, now the kaiser cheifs review...to highly scored i think!!

Arctic12 

Oct 15, 2008

Reviewing Rebecca Robinson’s reviews is always a tricky business. Any sort of faint praise and we get our hands cut off for being traitors to the art of reviewing music, but if we give her a proper bashing we’re boorish and predictable. There’s no denying that she writes more shit than most.So what has she pulled out of the bag this time? Shite all. This is the same as every other Robinson review, so don’t be fooled into thinking she’s improving because of her confusing mixture of personal abuse and snide comments. The first paragraph is poor and it’s all downhill after that (insert ‘Spiralling’ pun here – clever!!). “I am just trying to be cool and score a few cheap points,” bleated Rebecca Robinson: let’s hope that we don’t have to listen to her any more.

wollywiz 

Oct 15, 2008

I was under the impression that NME was a respected name in the Music Scene, so i came here to read the Keane review, how wrong I was, what a total load of dross from Rebecca, how you can class this as a review is beyond me.NME has lost all credability by having people like Rebecca trying to write reviews for them, which is a shame as NME used to mean Quality!! Sadly not anymore :(

foolishwolf 

Oct 16, 2008

Hilarious review and I completely agree. As a former Keane fan I found that the album just flat out sucked ass.Back to the drawing board fellas.

Soundedd 

Oct 16, 2008

I like Keane to be honest, and I've got this album and it's great, happy days! It's better than Only By The Night ;) well thats my opinion anyway, i'm just a kid who likes music :D

greg gregerson 

Oct 16, 2008

Some might say you weren't very KEANE to listen to the album

matt_the_crib 

Oct 16, 2008

To be honest i agree with this review in every single way lol, Keane are shit.

A_Dis 

Oct 16, 2008

I have no problem with NME slagging off the Keane album as they should call it as they see it. The problem is the agenda that lies behind this review - 'Look at us - we're cool cos we hate Keane'. If Rebecca is worried about the NME's 'punk rock credentials' why did they give Oasis 8/10?

bragdad 

Oct 16, 2008

Just when you thought the reviews couldnt get any worse. I'm not a Keane fan in the slightest, but this is a joke. Apparently the NME's sales figures are falling, lets hope so with reviews like this.

spunkydory 

Oct 16, 2008

If it's shit, I'd rather read a funny few paragraphs than a song-by-song critique of exactly WHY it's shit. It's the NME, not fucking Which? magazine you moaning cumjars!

zoodude 

Oct 16, 2008

NME is bad, Keane are shit

97mde 

Oct 17, 2008

A_Dis Agreed. Amazing how the Oasis album got very lukewarm reviews everywhere EXCEPT the NME who gave away an album sampler the week before. Yet, the Keane album which has got fantastic reviews everywhere get's panned for no reason at all. Or was the reason, that it's not cool to like Keane, but it is Oasis (who haven't made a decent album since 1995). It's quite a sad state of affairs really and no wonder sales of NME have hit the skids.

karmunyu 

Oct 17, 2008

Do u know music? How about you write a song and post it on the web and see what people think? You shitte bastard.

alicairns 

Oct 17, 2008

Wake up Britain. She's given Keane 2/10 because there's no progression eveident from their earlier work. NME doesn't pretend to be a format that lauds either manufactured pop music or tired, middle of the road soft rock crass. The NME staff help break new music, hence the name NME...For everyone out that that feels a shiver down their backs when It's my own cheating heart comes on realised the very first time Atlantis to Iterzone came on that music journalism that isn't afraid to applaud music based on technical prowess alone I salute you. If some of these comentees had their way Yes would top the album charts still and The Feeling would document our daily struggle to make the rent, go out and get fucked up (on herbal tea, doubtlessly) and play music too loud at 3am to annoy everyone around. Personally I think reviews of shiot albums should have a sense of humour. I listened to 3 tracks and laughed my ass off. Poor Rebecca had the whole thing to listen too. NME IS the difference. For the doubters, there's Q, Kerrang, Mojo and countless others with objective reviews. So take your Scouting for Girls albums and fuck

red mist 85 

Oct 20, 2008

What the hell kind of review is this!! It's just a barrage of abuse. If you don't like the band, fair enough, but at least have some maturity to write a sensible review. This only reinforces my belief that the opinions of critics, (and in Rebecca's case I use the word loosley), are often complete bollocks and your better off using your own judgement!!

riverboat song 

Oct 22, 2008

i really dont get what people see in this band cos i dont know many people who like them and i personally think they are a very less than average band

RealMode 

Oct 22, 2008

alicairns: there is a certain sound progression into 80s disco funky style, if u haven't spotted.

Fivestrings 

Oct 22, 2008

I seriously do not understand what the fuss is about. It's just a review. What most of you do not seem to understand is that reviewing any album is always a matter of taste. The only difference between Rebecca and the lot of you who are ranting on this page is that she gets to write a review in NME and you don't. She fuckin' hates the album and it's her good right to write about that if she wants to. And it is your good right to disagree. Let's leave it at that, shall we?

jamesscarry13 

Oct 23, 2008

perfect review

Soundedd 

Oct 24, 2008

It didn't sell 80,000 in the first week (more than wank like Metallica) for nothing, brilliant band, brilliant album and better than Under The Iron Sea, The Lovers Are Losing is one of my singles of the year.

mickeyhynes 

Oct 24, 2008

Keane and Coldplay = music to watch patients die to on 'Grey's Anatomy'...

rag and bone 

Oct 27, 2008

I'd say the review is about correct. Possibly the 2 out of ten is harsh, as Keane do not really commit any sins on this album (and I have heard it in full, unlike many others it seems) they are just unbelievably mediocre. 5 out of 10 is perhaps more apt.

awade 

Oct 27, 2008

yeah, keane isn't that good or original but what sucks worse is your review, clearly you're a douchebag.

THERAHMAN 

Oct 27, 2008

I am not sure which I hate more, Keane or the NME. Keane, for being Keane, or the NME for being a bunch of old farts, standing at the bustop, trying to be hip, telling you how much they hate Keane....

humphrey161 

Oct 27, 2008

I thought a review is meant to be just that, having read ms robinsons review several times I see only a brief comment on the music 'that confusingly funky ’80s-style' was that 2 out of 10 for the music or your critque rebecca

Spunkrat 

Oct 28, 2008

This is why NME are losing their status as a once great music magazine. Please get some great reviewers in that can actually see through the 'its commercial so lets bash it' review. Its predictable and boring. This isnt the best album ever produced but it definately shows promise for the chubby public school lead singer and his merry toffs. I'm embarressed to say I like it. 6/10

thekillersandthewombats 

Oct 30, 2008

For fuck sake every time i post a comment on this website it says the same fucking thing...NME hates success, I can tell who NME are going to say they before they do the fucking review.To be successful in NME you must be 1 of these things:-Good but Overated eg muse, radiohead, coldplay-Generally shit eg Glasvegas, lightspeed champion-Completely unknown eg most of the bands who are in the generally shit category-Someone who shouldnt even be reviewed by NME cos they arnt the genre of music they are meant to review eg Katy Perry, Kate NashTo be unsuccessful in NME you must be 1 of the followeing:- Successful eg The Killers, courteeners, kooks, keane- Uncool eg KeaneI think its funny to watch as bands become successful watching NMEs reviews go down. The killers used to be one of NMEs favourite bands now they hate them. Who remembers the Jan 12 issue of NME? They said the 10 best bands of 2008 will be Foals, rascals, ting tings, black kids, mgmt, glasvegas, friendly fires, yo majesty, the courteeners, joe lean & JJJ, lightspeed championFoals, ting tings, black kids, MGMT (to some extent), courteeners were all pretty successful this year. They now hate

Adam2050 

Oct 30, 2008

Hey, new person here, please approach to slate. I signed up 10 seconds ago, to jump on the band wagon and complain about someone’s opinion. Ladies and gentlemen it an opinion, personally I think the new Keane album is average at best would go as far as saying 2 out of 10 but I would go as far as saying its the same Keane you have had for the last 2 albums. Nothing new nothing that makes you think I really want to spend £x amount to go and see this band Live, because there music is so uplifting it brings a tear to the eye every time you listen to Keane hit the piano the same time you have heard the first 5 songs over and over again. To be honest if anything Keane should be experienced to a least hit us with some classic songs. I've listened to this album a couple of times through and the feeling of similarities has just made me think, I have no want or desire to pick this album up and play it again for a while at least. I think I will choose something in the same genre that stands out

daviesma 

Oct 31, 2008

First things first: Keane are unbelievably shite. Dull, pompous sub-Coldplay music for the middle aged, with the "look, Mum, no guitars" USP just utterly tedious.On the subject of the review: why is anyone surprised by it? I've been reading NME on and off since the mid 80s (I'm therefore probably supposed to like Keane) and the mindset has always been the same - namely, anything that is popular, or looks like it is about to become popular is to be shot down in flames and ridiculed. I could recount 100s of bands who have been praised for 6 months, and then slaughtered. A sad reflection on today's media indeed.

unitedmarvel 

Nov 6, 2008

haha, who wrote this review? an old is he/she? I never bought Keanes first 2 albums but gave the 3rd a go, and yes there is some naff tunes, but there's also some really good stuff, especially new single and "better than this",

lolita87 

Nov 10, 2008

OMG WHAT IS THIS?!?!? whats your problem with them!!it was suposed to be a review!!!I bought all the albums and perfect symmetry is AWESOME!

Araul94 

Nov 10, 2008

I still don't get why Keane are so disliked, because they are educated and come from Sussex . I'm a fan of Keane, but I can admit the album isn't the best they've ever done. However, I think this review is stupidly pointless, is very opinionated (and only briefly mentions the music) and useless to anyone who wants to know whether the get the album or not. So what if Tim Rice-Oxley has a double barrel name? That makes him a crap musician?And whats with the constant references to other bands? Who cares if they take inspiration from other artists? Most rappers and 'popular' artists these days (like Gym Class Heroes and many others) actually remake an old song and release it as their own. I'm sure if Keane just did the same as their last album, they'd be slated as well. And as much as the album isn't great, it certainly does not deserve a two because the reviewers here think they're not punk enough to be considered worthy of a honest review.

thekillersandthewombats 

Nov 20, 2008

Dull, pompous sub-Coldplay musicI like how you make it seem like coldplay are good here, cos let me tell you coldplay are fucking shite

beNME118 

Nov 26, 2008

Ohhhh.... what a surprise, yet again NME have gave a famous band a bad reveiw, it's pretty obvious this reveiwer likes them because she hardly mentions anything to do with the music, she's just too 'cool' to admit it, i know keane arn't the best band on earth but seriously 2/10?I mean all these NME reveiwers who think they are awesome indie geeky kids who only like unknown bands yet to become popular and when they become popular they start hating them need to get real or get the sack!

ibrahimThe 

Nov 28, 2008

i have a simple pointing system: if an LP have 10good songs, than give 10\10, keane's debut have 11good songs and second have 9. This 3rd have only6 so i gave 6\10

crazyjeyesy 

Dec 5, 2008

I thought the album was a load of bland rubbish on the first listen but as a previous Keane fan I gave it a few more goes. It really is a grower and I'm loving it now. Those of you slagging it off after one listen, try a few more.

timm90 

Dec 8, 2008

i doubt i would like the new keane album, but i would surely listen to it before i criticised it- it seems rebecca has only looked at 2 of the song titles in order to deliver her meaningless review on it.

keira1345 

Dec 29, 2008

rebecca - seriosuly, you call this a review? it is simply bashing the band and putting in a few not-so-clever jokes, making fun of his name for god sake. and the 'we're not listening', is obviously not a totally shared opinion because believe it or not people do buy this album and like it. yes, you are trying to keep the kids happy who only listen to bands who do not have mainstream sucess, but just looking at the song titles and digging at the bands image is not a review.

miss strange 

Dec 29, 2008

The author may like or dislike Keane's new album; it's a moot point. The issue here is that she has not bothered to review 'Perfect Symmetry' at all. She simply has not said anything relevant about the music. That's unacceptable journalism and NME should have higher standards than that.

blackbird_ 

Jan 4, 2009

excellent review!!

Ulfilas 

May 1, 2009

Did you ever notice how Pitchforkmedia and NME are often almost identical in their album rankings? For instance, they both gave Suede's last album about a 7/10 when everyone else hovered around the 5/10 mark, and here they are both being more scathing about this lot than anyone else.Worth looking in to, especially as they're absolutely right on both counts.

Add your comment

Free weekly music news, videos and MP3s in your inbox:

Keane CDs