First For Music News

The Rascals

Rascalize

Miles Kane’s bandmates must wonder whether to bless or curse their frontman’s involvement with Alex Turner. While The Last Shadow Puppets project has swamped their young band in more attention than if they’d scaled Big Ben in Womble costumes, they might also have cause to wish he’d hung onto a few of his best ideas for them.

‘The Age Of The Understatement’ carefully balanced Kane’s love of melodramatic, string-swept ‘60s chamber-pop with the rough-edged, chunky bluster of post-Arctics indie. The Rascals’ own debut, on the other hand, for all the Wirral three-piece’s professed darkness and strangeness, is more pragmatic than dramatic. As with many of the current crop of everyman guitar bands (The Pigeons, The Twang, The Enemy), there’s nothing that exciting either, nothing to really grasp on to and love.

All the right references and some sonic tricks are present and correct too, from the galloping psychobilly bassline of ‘Does Your Husband Know You Are On The Run’ to the Johnny Kidd & The Pirates slink and niggling guitar of ‘I’d Be Lying to You’. These touches seem more like a decoration or diversions, though, from a fairly standard, rollicking indie-rock that sounds all too familiar, They owe more to the Monkeys than a leg-up in terms of column inches, after all; it was a support tour with the then-bright young hopes that inspired them to snuff The Little Flames and form The Rascals, and there’s a clear debt in their strutting basslines and sarky social observation (“People-watching is one of my favourite ways to pass the time” notes Kane on, er, ‘People Watching’).

In light of this, opening with ‘Rascalize’ a brass-necked manifesto that leans heavily on The Beatles’ ‘Magical Mystery Tour’, seems less than wise, Kane boasting, “All aboard for the adventure”.
In truth they’re closer to Gerry & The Pacemakers than the Fab father of weird-pop, or, in more modern terms, more The Zutons than The Coral. The latter is a name they’ll get sick of hearing, most often in conjunction with the words “poor” and “man’s” as The Rascals lack the inherent drive towards the odd of Skelly and co – their carefully placed peculiarities are more knowing allusion than genuine sonic exploration. They’re actually at their best when most direct and unaffected, as on the genuinely thrilling grungey snarl of ‘I’ll Give You Sympathy’. One musical influence that’s noticeably less present is Kane’s beloved Scott Walker; yes, there’s intrigue-laden lyrical tableau of ‘Bond Girl’ but you can’t imagine the man himself giving them more than a few seconds before breaking the CD and combining the shards with squirrel intestines to create some crazy new instrument. Perhaps less time spent constructing solid, unremarkable riffs and more spent testing out the percussive qualities of chunks of dead rodent à la Scott might make this album actually exciting. As it is, it’s just adequate. Welcome to the age of the underwhelm-ment.

Emily Mackay

6 out of 10
 
 
 

Comments (29)

Add a comment

Topshop.Princess 

Jun 12, 2008

i think it will be a good album

user name already exists 

Jun 12, 2008

'you can’t imagine the man himself giving them more than a few seconds before breaking the CD and combining the shards with squirrel intestines to create some crazy new instrument' is the worst sentence i have ever read.

dcajoe 

Jun 12, 2008

That album title is awful.

donnymfc 

Jun 12, 2008

What an awful review - I'd be the first to admit that there isn't much to the Rascals, but fuck, how about describing their failures properly rather than pompously chucking in phrases and big words to show off yor vocabulary. The worst CD review I have ever read

shakermaker88 

Jun 14, 2008

Im glad other people agree, i read it in the mag this week and i was shocked this review appeared in the NME. People might not like the album but it deserves a decent review, regardless of how it's rated. A waste really coz the Rascals are a young band, they're always trying new things to be fair, give them a couple of albums and they'll make a classic.

frebox1991 

Jun 14, 2008

i reckon the rascals are quite good. i think most of the time, critics just slag bands off because it's easier to write how bad they are than to how good they are.

sean-lfc 

Jun 17, 2008

donnymfc hit the nail on the head. worst cd review ever!!

zongamin 

Jun 17, 2008

Album is pretty good - more like a '7' than a '6'.This review, on the other hand, reads like it was lifted from a 15 year old's blog. Don't you have an editor?

monty12345 

Jun 17, 2008

great album; 7 out of 10 atleast, listened to it on the media player, how can you possibly compare the rascals to the pigeons, the twang or the enemy who are all shite!

monty12345 

Jun 17, 2008

zongamin. from the number of crap reveiws full of cliches and contradictions- its fair to say nme dont have an editor

gusto 

Jun 18, 2008

NME reviews just tend to get worse!!!! How on earth can an obvious prat like Emily Mackay be allowed to write such self obsessed nonsense. Think you should send her to the star, the sun or some other crap paper.As for the album, OK not an instant classic but still some very strong tracks here. Good debut. Give these guys time and the classic will come.

Koreema_know 

Jun 18, 2008

That review annoyed me considerably.6 out of 10 is a little harsh. I'd personally give it a 7. To me The Rascals are similar to the Arctics but with a somewhat darker, more sinister edge. Well that's what they're aiming for anyway.Point is, Rascalize isn't a bad album! Comparing them to the bloody Twang is idiotic, and that review did my head in NME!!!

adie_shad 

Jun 18, 2008

you, at the NME, are a bunch of idiots. Obnoxious idiots at that. This type of review is precisely why I don't buy your magazine anymore.

seeb123 

Jun 18, 2008

melodramatic, string-swept ‘60s chamber-pop with the rough-edged, chunky bluster of post-Arctics indie.What the fuck does that sound like. dire review.

iseabail 

Jun 19, 2008

well im excited about the album anyway :)

dalemoffat 

Jun 20, 2008

what a shit review! he should get the sack

Kid B 

Jun 20, 2008

I haven't heard the album, but I read this review out of curiosity. Despite what a lot of other people have said, it's a good review. I think I now have a fairly solid idea of what this album's like, anyway. The sentence about squirrel intestines actually made a good point, people.

Simondo89 

Jun 20, 2008

Complete rubbish, these album reviews are getting more ridiciulous time and time again, It wouldn't be the slightest suprise if the album wasn't even listened too in depth

FenderJaguar 

Jun 23, 2008

I like this review. I've only heard a couple of tracks, but the review does appeal to be pretty fair. Especially the bit about pragamitism over art.Overall though I feel the Rascals have been the victim of 'early release', they have enough talent to release a good second album.

dan39lfc 

Jun 30, 2008

OH MY GOD THIS SAD EXCUSE OF AN ALBUM IS A JOKE! CONSIDERING WHAT HE DID WITH HIS BOYFRIEND ALEX TURNER I WAS VERY SURPRISED BECAUSE ITS JUS AWFULL EVERY SONG SOUNDS THE SAME NOTHING NO1'S HERD A THOUSAND TIMES BEFORE MUSICALLY SHIT LYRICALLY SHIT JUST A PROPER LET DWN IM OPEN TO ANYTHINK BUT I GAVE THIS A CHANCE AND 1 WORD SPRINGS TO MIND BORING!!! GIVE UP YOUR DAY JOB AND STAY WITH MR TURNER BECAUSE IF YOU KEEP PRODUCING MUSIC LIKE THIS YOU WNT BE ROUND MUCH LONGER MATE.( THE MUSIC JUST DOESNT STAND UP) DRESS IT UP HOWEVER YOU WANT ITS SHITE!

kingmonkey4 

Jun 30, 2008

This what gets me about NME your here to support new bands and get them on the road and keep them going and get people into them but all you do is slag them off which is wrong, get behind the small bands and support them. and how can you compare them we The Twang and Pigeons there nothing like them are they, what a pathetic write up on The Rascals i dont know how your still in a job whoever wrote this, im glad i dont buy NME no more we reporters writing like this its shocking, you know nothing we reports like this, go get another job elsewhere if your hearts not in it and let someone else musically minded write something decent instead of just slagging off our bands.

rag and bone 

Jun 30, 2008

The review is just about right in my opinion, even if the word-play is more than a bit pretentious. The Rascals are a semi-decent, run of the mill band, and they have made a semi-decent, run of the mill album. Having said that, I reckon there is just a spark in there somewhere.

Grendel 

Jul 6, 2008

Terrible review,The album's great!!

Steve111 

Sep 3, 2008

terrible review, this album is one of the best if not the best record of 2008 sooo far!

thefratellis+theenemyareshit. 

Sep 9, 2008

I saw this band at leeds festival this year... They might as well scribble out the rascals and put "antarctic monkeys" because this is basically the biggest rip off i have ever heard. I certainly don't buy the fake sheffield accent as well considering they are from Merseyside.

lillankychris 

Sep 14, 2008

shocking title shoking first track but the rest is pretty good

Matt Mate 

Sep 16, 2008

A few people have said it here but i just had to put my 3 pennies worth in...what a shit album title.

WeeHacky 

Sep 29, 2008

you, sir, are a dick. be a bit more open minded, seperate the last shadow puppets when you review a rascals album, this totally deserves an 8/10.

BLUWAR 

Oct 27, 2008

Its a great album, I have listened to it 5 times and gets better with each listen its a real grower, the album is as good as anything the Arctic's have put out.

Add your comment

Free weekly music news, videos and MP3s in your inbox:

The Rascals CDs